Submit Comments to the FCC — Preserve Local Control of Cell Towers/ Pennsylvania Win Heads to Supreme Court

Hello Safer Technology Supporter,

It is imperative that YOU submit comments ASAP (if you haven’t already) opposing BOTH the latest move by the corrupt FCC to obliterate local planning control over cell towers AND laws moving through congress that echo these efforts:

1) See crucial and timely federal red alert from Vicki Sievers below. Follow instructions. See links at the bottom for sample letters and other resources.

2) Click here to send a note of opposition on similar bills going through congress.

Also, thanks to your support, we will be reprinting Public Health Warning Cards and Smart Meter Awareness brochures and they should be available in early 2026. We also have posters, displays, pre-owned emf meters of various types, and other materials not shown in our online store.  Contact us for more details. We still have hundreds of wireless warning cards (en espanol) that are FREE if you can help us distribute them to spanish speaking communities.

Send in your FCC comments today, let congress hear how pissed off you are about this and make sure to send copies to all your elected officials!  

“Hill to Die on” sounds serious! Better pay attention!

Begin forwarded message:

 

From: Vicki Sievers <vickisievers911@gmail.com>

Subject: !! IMPT ACTIONS to save local control of cell towers/antennas

Date: November 16, 2025 at 00:01:06 PST

To: Vicki Sievers <victoriasievers@earthlink.net>

 

STOP COMPLETE FCC TAKEOVER OF WIRELESS DEPLOYMENT!

 

Big thanks for action you’ve already taken. 

 

If you have not yet acted, please do so right away. Submissions are imperative. So much is at stake, and the clock is ticking.

 

WHAT IS HAPPENING: FCC rulemaking (No. 25-276: “Build America: Eliminating Barriers to Wireless Deployments”) seeks to render local governments powerless by removing regulations now in effect. The proposal allows  Big Telecom to install antennas anywhere they please. It wipes out ordinance protections (local zoning, setbacks) that citizens and cities achieved in Marin-Sonoma and elsewhere in 2018-19. It strips away any legal means of fighting back, and silences public input. Increased surveillance will usher in unprecedented loss of privacy.

 

ACTION STEPS

#1) Compose a brief (or any length) letter in a Word document (or by hand). Save it so you can file it with the FCC and send separate copies to elected officials. (You may want to convert it to a pdf.)

Type or write in email subject line: Re: WC Docket No. 25-276, Build America: Eliminating Barriers to Wireless Deployment.

In the body of the letter you might tell if you or persons you know have been injured or affected in any way by wireless deployments. Be factual, and include relevant resources if you can. Include any of the excellent CHD talking points offered below.* Also see three sample letters linked below; these are in Word format so that you may borrow, modify, personalize.

In cc line list any of the following parties that you choose—title + name:  Your Mayor; your City Council members; your State Senator; your State Assembly rep; your US Congressperson; CA US Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla. (If you are handwriting, list cc parties below your signature)

#2:  Submit or mail your letter to the FCC  Use FCC online docket or US Postal Service.

(Docket Proceeding now open: Submission deadline to be announced soon.) Choose ONE below:

    • Submit express filings to FCC docket:

Go to https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express. Under proceeding(s), enter 25-276 so that it populates.

Fill in your name, address, email, etc. (follow the prompts).

Note: Express filings do not separate paragraphs or preserve formatting. 

          • Submit standard filings to FCC docket:

Standard submission preferred when sending a letter.

Go to https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/standard. Under proceeding(s), enter 25-276 so that it populates.

Follow prompts. When asked what type of filing, choose: “Comment” …red means *required.

Submit your letter as a Word doc or pdf attachment and include any other attachments that support your letter.

• Submit via US Post Office:

Address letter to:

            Office of the Secretary Marlene Dortch

Federal Communications Commission

45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554

#3) Send/mail your letter separately to the parties in your cc list. You will need their email/mailing addresses from their websites. What is the objective of these mailings? Your elected representatives should read what you—their constituent— has submitted to the Federal Communications Commission!🚩

Thank you for understanding how serious this is, and for putting fingertips to keyboard or pen to paper.

(If you’d like help with the FCC docket filing, specific line-by-line instructions are provided in the attached Alert! Stop 25-276 or please let me know and I’ll assist. vs)

*Talking points from CHD

 What the proposed rules mean for your community:

Silences your community’s voice. What the FCC calls “streamlining” is really shutting you out. Public hearings would disappear, conditional and special use permits would vanish, and elected officials would be powerless. Decisions about your residential streets, your schools, and your health & safety would be made by telecom companies driven by profit, not by your concerns expressed to your local leaders.

Imposes automatic tower approval after 150 days. The FCC calls local review “unreasonable delays.” If your city doesn’t rubber-stamp a tower application in time, it’s approved automatically — even if there is fierce local opposition. Your voices are silenced; your hands are tied.

Removes independent review. The FCC wants to bar localities from hiring their own experts to test radiation safety. Instead, the industry would police itself — and communities would be silenced.

Eliminates existing protections. The FCC wants to force towers in the middle of quiet residential streets including street lights in front of your homes, on playgrounds, over classrooms, scenic hilltops, pastoral farmland, and in historic districts — and your neighborhood will have no power to stop it.

Threatens property rights and local budgets. The FCC wants to strip communities of the ability to cover the true costs of oversight or protect property values. Families could see their biggest investment — their homes — lose value overnight, with no compensation.

🤔How important is it for you—an individual (or organization)—to take action?

**The National Call has issued: Alert Stop 25-276 The FCC Power Grab attached

**Environmental Health Sciences shouts: Tell Your Lawmakers: Protect Community Control For Cell Towers —File Comments on FCC Docket 25-276. See “letter writing campaign.” attached.

**Reinette Senum, fiery former mayor, former gubernatorial candidate, safe-tech activist, telecom-shenanigan expert and savvy substacker, calls this “the hill to die on,” and she is not kiddinghttps://reinette senum foghorn express.substack.com/p/the-hill-to-die-on-volume-3-silent

Pennsylvania Woman Scores Temporary Win Against Smart Meter Mandate

A Pennsylvania woman with a disability aggravated by wireless radiation from smart meters won a temporary court ruling allowing her to keep using a mechanical meter to avoid exposure. The judge also ordered her electric company to continue providing power to her home while her lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania’s smart meter mandate proceeds.

Full article:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pennsylvania-woman-scores-temporary-win-smart-meter-mandate/

Now the smart meter case is heading to the US supreme court and those battling to keep their analog meters are asking for legal support on the case before the Dec. 28th deadline- see here.

Files to help with your FCC submission:

https://stopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Sample-letter-1-for-FCC-25-276.docx

https://stopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Sample-letter-2-for-FCC-25-276.docx

https://stopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Sample-letter-3.docx

https://mstr.app/6a9c7942-b50d-454b-bc65-c1341f684e3d

https://stopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Alert-Stop-25276-the-FCC-Power-Grab-Over-Cell-Towers.pdf

Posted in Democracy, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, FCC, Federal Government, legal issues, Pennsylvania, Washington DC | Leave a comment

PG&E Applying for Half Billion to Replace Aging Gas Meters- Electric Next?

We told you smart meters don’t last long and now the bill has come due…
Nina B. of SmartMeterHarm.org reports: PG&E wants $498 million to replace the AMI modules on the Smart gas meters because the modules are “approaching the end of their expected useful life,”  according to PG&E’s notice in the Monterey County Herald. PG&E filed Application A.24-03-011,  March 14.
The notice also states “Starting in 2027, further costs will be included in the General Rate Case process.” It’s unclear if they mean AMI/Smart Meter costs. If PG&E means to replace the electric Smart Meters, the costs will be astronomical.
Does PG&E expect those who don’t have Smart Meters to pay these costs? Probably. Stay tuned.
PG&E application:
Posted in California, CPUC, Democracy, PG&E, Smart Grid | 3 Comments

Support Tennessee Smart Meter Legislation

TennesseeWired.com writes:

So much has been happening here in Tennessee!  We have a good opt out bill in which was modelled after Vermont’s law and Massachusetts’ current opt out bill.  Next Tuesday Tennessee’s SB-2232 will be voted on in the Senate Committee.  We know the odds are long, but we happy to be this far.  
We are hoping for a wave of support from Tennessee and across the nation, between now and the end of next Monday, March 11th.  Please spread the word!
Posted in Citizen rebellion, Democracy, legal issues, Smart Grid, Tennessee, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

NOW is the time to Speak Up for Landline Telephones. Can You Hear Me Now?

Thank you very much to Californians for Safe Technology for the alert below. There is more information at SaveLandlines.org also.

CALL TO ACTION- PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY AND TAKE ACTION TODAY

AT&T has applied with the California PUC to discontinue its Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) obligations for copper wire landlines. This decision would have devastating effects on consumer choice and public safety by phasing out essential landline services for all Californians – and would be particularly devastating to the elderly and those in rural communities.

Your help in this will protect essential copper landlines from being decommissioned across California.What can you do?

1.   Call and/or Email – Calling is preferred, but both would be better. Sending an email only is second best – See talking points below. This should be done as soon as possible.

Alice Reynolds Office of the President / Executive Director Rachel Peterson (916) 894-5641 bdt@cpuc.ca.gov

John Reynolds Commissioner

john.reynolds@cpuc.ca.gov

Maria Sotero Policy Advisor and Interim Chief of Staff

(415) 703-2494 maria.sotero@cpuc.ca.gov

Pilar Manriquez Deputy Chief of Staff

(916) 894-5689 pilar.manriquez@cpuc.ca.gov

Sasha Goldberg – Advisor

(415) 703-5340 sasha.goldberg@cpuc.ca.gov

Cait Pollock – Advisor

(415) 703-1535 caitlin.pollock@cpuc.ca.gov

Jake McDermott – Advisor

(415) 703-1860jake.mcdermott@cpuc.ca.gov

Carolyn Chen – Advisor

(415) 703-1980 carolyn.chen@cpuc.ca.gov

3. Add a Public Comment

https://apps.cpuc.ca.gov/apex/f?p=401:65:0::NO:RP,57,RIR:P5_PROCEEDING_SELECT:A2303002

Talking Points:

Why do we need copper landlines?

  1. The elderly population is more dependent on copper landlines and more likely to experience technology aversion and often do not have the ability or desire to use other technology.
  2. Traditional copper landline service is tied to an address making it the most dependable emergency communications tool currently available and is vital to helping emergency services identify your exact location.
  3. Copper landlines are more reliable than wireless or VoIP services in urban, suburban, and rural areas because the copper-based systems can still work even when the power is out.
  4. Many rural areas depend on their copper landlines and lack other options.
  5. Some people and businesses prefer the quality of wired connections.
  6. Some people have debilitating symptoms when in close proximity to wireless connections.
Posted in CPUC, Democracy, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, landlines, neighborhood organizing, radio-frequency radiation, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Safe Living Technologies “Safe and Sound” RF Meters Available in our Store

Some people have asked why we no longer sell the Cornet meters that we sold for many years in our online store.

Though the Cornet 88T PLUS has been and continues to be an essential and popular tool for detecting smart meter radiation and other RF sources over the years, with the moving graph function very helpful for visualizing harmful smart meter radiation spikes, and many useful functions and extras, there have been some issues that have lead us to now generally recommend the use of Safe Living Technologies meters for regular RF detection.

Issues we have noticed with the Cornets include:

— inadequate measurement of the 5-8 GHz range (used for many wi-fi routers and cordless phones)

— not manufactured primarily for EMF health usage (like SLT meters)

— complex functionality that many people didn’t utilize

While it may seem tempting to buy a multi-function meter like the Cornet (to get “all in one” EMF measurement) or a cheap EMF meter from Amazon, we have concluded that these meters fall short when compared to higher quality single function meters like the SLT meters.

The Safe and Sound Classic and Safe and Sound Pro 2 both share the same antenna, and internal microprocessors. The difference between the two (apart from price) is that the Pro 2 also provides specific RF power density numbers (max., avg, and peak) which are very helpful if you need more granular measurements– eg. when you are trying to find the source of a RF signal.

Pick up a “Safe and Sound” meter today in our online store today and help meet our ongoing costs to run the website and hotline etc. If you can’t afford a meter, please e-mail us about used meters, and other options. Everyone needs EMF detection, to know what levels you are exposed to and deal with them.

Especially important for those with Electro-Hyper Sensitivity, but actually crucial equipment for everyone living in our electro-polluted world today, a Safe and Sound RF meter makes a great holiday gift.

Shop Stop Smart Meters! Online Store Today

Posted in Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, EMF Mitigation, radio-frequency radiation | 1 Comment